« Dull little commercials | Main | The same old "new" media order »
February 27, 2006
Convergence: a zero sum game
One of the great things about having one's notes stored in a database, rather than a collection of tattered spiral-bound notebooks is that (a) you can actually read your notes and (b) if you're attending an IT event, it's easy to check what the industry is telling you this year, against what they were telling you last year. [We're amazed that up here at the KickStart IT media conference, although around a dozen journos are taking their notes on laptops, none of them seems to be using Info Select for turning those notes into a searchable database. Don't they know it's an indispensable tool for anyone involved in the so-called knowledge business?]
Our superior record-keeping meant that we were able to establish that the enthusiasm voiced by the speakers at this year's session on digital home entertainment was pretty much unchanged from that of last year, despite the fact that precisely nothing had happened in the intervening period, to justify it.
Our friend and colleague Graeme Philipson (today's his birthday, which makes the black eye he picked up by falling over last night even more tragic) proved why he didn't survive as a Gartner analyst, with another completely honest and accurate summation of the situation: "Convergence is still a long way away," he reported, largely because the industries involved were still operating in a complete vaccuum, and were trying to send each other broke while at the same time avoiding accomplishing the same fate for themselves.
In the meantime, of 1000 Australian households surveyed last year on the issue of this home convergence, only 10 per cent could nominate a home automation supplier, and 80 per cent of them nominated B & D Roller Door.
What fascinates us, whenever the industry starts talking about the joys of television time-shifting etc., is that here in Australia the commercial televison networks are engaged in an entirely different form of time-shifting - a sadistic form of programming which so often guarantees that when you replay that show that you absolutely didn't want to miss, at the precise point when the mystery is about to be solved, or the hero and the heroine are about to realise their love for each other etc, a little message pops up informing you that playback has stopped. This is not what we call convergence.
And unfortunately, while the competitors are playing this zero sum game, consumers who choose the wrong technology from the bewildering range of competitors - has anyone noticed that those Microsoft Windows Media Centre devices don't seem to be all that widely available these days? - are probably going to be considerably out of pocket.
Posted by cw at February 27, 2006 12:30 PM
Comments
Well mate, I'm sitting about two meters away from you and I offer a different solution - Word on the Mac.
I put it into Notebook mode and it's able to record the audio with the mac's inbuilt mic and I can take notes ate the same time.
I put all the notes in a folder and let Spotlight find things for me when I need to retrieve them.
Granted, it's not as elegant a database system but it does the job nicely for me.
CW: True, true. Spotlight and the Mac are a good solution. But how many of them were being used to record the session? Aside from yours, of course.
Posted by: Anthony Caruana at February 27, 2006 01:32 PM

