« Moving caves? | Main | It's lucky that Yahoo and Google didn't invent e-mail »
September 01, 2005
Disappearing bandwidth
You might recall Bleeding Edge raised the matter recently of a reader who believed his wireless network had been hacked. In one hour his entire month's traffic allowance under his BigPond ADSL account evaporated.
After establishing that his security left a good deal to be desired, we concluded that it was entirely possible that someone had sneaked on to his network, or a Trojan - malicious software that installs itself and runs surreptitiously - had been at work.
We received emails from other readers that indicated that this was not an isolated occurrence for BigPond broadband users and that the first half of August seemed to be a busy time for exceeding traffic limits.
The most recent report on the number of complaints to the Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman on disputed usage charges for cable and ADSL internet for all providers nationally in the first three months of this year was 147.
The ombudsman doesn't indicate which providers were involved in these cases, but the reports to Bleeding Edge suggest that many users are not aware that they can take these complaints to there. It also suggests that network-wide, BigPond must be getting a lot of disputed bills, which BigPond denies.
A spokesman said: "A small percentage of our customers go over their monthly usage limits." He added that users "may find that occasional excess usage charges are better value for them than a higher-priced plan". While that may be true, it could also be an expensive strategy, given that BigPond's excess data charges are 15 cents a megabyte.
The reports from our readers revealed some remarkable coincidences. Like the subject of our article, two customers had also just updated their accounts when they started receiving automated emails from BigPond telling them that their free allowances were fast disappearing. Telstra says its technology staff have never heard of an instance where excess usage was triggered by a change of plan. "In fact, we have large numbers of customers who change between plans, so any such problem would clearly be apparent."
The users who wrote to us had much better security in place. They suspect that the data flows Telstra claimed to have recorded did not occur and that Telstra may be having problems with its traffic metering system. Telstra, however, says it is "confident that our usage collection and displays are correct".
One person, having had the same thing happen twice - and twice upgrading to a higher (and more expensive) limit - is particularly disturbed by the fact that Telstra has also stopped providing daily usage figures so users now can only see their traffic at the end of the month.
A Telstra spokesman said the company will introduce a new version of its software "in a month or so" to update usage "more regularly". He said customers can check account balances on the My BigPond site, where figures are updated within the hour.
What should be a major concern to BigPond customers is that at least two of the cases referred to us involved uploaded data. Most internet traffic is downloaded from websites or email inboxes, but your computer also uploads a much smaller amount, generally in the form of software requests for webpages, outgoing email and attachments. When a Trojan is at work, those uploads can reach staggering and expensive levels.
To our knowledge, BigPond is the only major internet service provider that charges for upload traffic. That means that BigPond users are the only ones exposed to unpleasant billing surprises from sources such as Trojans. In our opinion, that makes them the least attractive offering in the market.
According to the ombudsman, many users are unaware of the difference between uploads and downloads. They seem equally unaware of precisely what a megabyte or gigabyte constitutes. The SP2 patch for Windows XP, for instance, which most users would have downloaded, varied from about 80 to 265MB. Microsoft's average updates are much smaller, but they're now a regular event with an increasing number of software companies, and users on basic plans can quickly exhaust their limits.
The issue has become more critical with BigPond cutting its 500MB cable plan to 400MB last week. It now has a 400MB limit on its $39.95 monthly ADSL plan. The 500MB ADSL plan costs $69.95, but the upload and download speeds are dramatically increased, which means a month's allowance could disappear even quicker.
We recommend users check their internet traffic with DU Meter. It gives daily, weekly and monthly reports of downloads and uploads.
Posted by cw at September 1, 2005 11:10 AM
Comments
Posted by: steff at September 1, 2005 01:23 PM
Good suggestion about DU Meter - there is another option for Firefox users, an extension called Net Usage Item, which has settings for the big Australian ISPs, and which updates itself regularly. It also shows free offpeak use which is nice for me on Optus cable..
Posted by: Ben at September 1, 2005 01:47 PM
The Ombudsman is a waste of time. If you have a problem with your Telco and cant resolve it switch Telcos. Calling the Ombudsman is a great way to spend lots of time waiting to be told they cant or more likely cant be bothered to help you. All they do is collect complaint statistics. We deserve better.
Posted by: Anonymous at September 2, 2005 06:35 AM
I think that's a touch unfair to the TIO. They seem to be able to resolve conflicts in the user's favour in a very high percentage of cases.
Posted by: cw at September 2, 2005 11:48 AM
It looks a bit like tel$tra telephone bills, they have all the say on what calls you have made particuarly from home phones, whether you've actually made them or not tou still have to pay for them!
Posted by: Anonymous at September 2, 2005 06:01 PM
Man! Don't even bother with Telstra.
www.whirlpool.net.au - There are tons of better providers.
* Internode
* Netspace
* iiNet
* TPG
are some really good examples of internet providers
Posted by: Kinjeto at September 2, 2005 08:41 PM
Last month I upgraded to a faster BigPond ADSL HIBIS plan and for the first time went way over 500MB so have to pay a lot extra. Can't really understand how my usage increased so much in one month. It's going fast this month too. Have tried DU Meter. It indicates I'm using more MB than BigPond says I'm using. Does DU Meter track my local network usage? Why the difference?
Posted by: Ken at September 6, 2005 04:10 PM
We have Bigpond ADSL at work. Last Christmas we got a $90 bill for excess usage... problem was there was no-one in our office that entire week! Telstra withdrew the charges thankfully and we moved to a capped plan.
I'd never recommend Telstra. You can get a capped plan with Comcen (who uses the Teltra network) at a much lower cost and much higher (download only) cap (and even when I've reached the cap I've never had my line speed reduced!).
Posted by: Bradley at October 3, 2005 12:37 PM
I had the same problem with Big Pond. We got adsl friday and used it, then sunday I logged in to check how much I had used and it said 113 meg. DU meter said I had only downloaded 37 meg and my lan connection showed the same i called bigpond about this and they said I could make a claim for a credit. "That's not what I want... what about next month?" I said. "Your software is wrong." They dont believe me so I upgraded to the unlimited plan******* pay attention to the star. Sneaky buggers.
Posted by: Andrew at July 26, 2006 08:26 PM

